As America cheers on Cameron regarding his speech in Munich about the failure of multiculturalism, one has to wonder what world we are living in. Since when did people agree with the prime ministers disbelief and practical ban of "government funds to groups which reject democracy, personal freedom, the separation of church and state and the equality of women before the law?" A free world I hear you cry, but isn't this so called 'free world' one which welcomes culture,religion and equality.Cameron was blatant in his pursuit of singling out Islam as he announced there would be tighter inspections on government money for islamic groups in a bid to tackle extremism.
Apparently he believes most extremism is found in universities and prisons and must be watched over. But does he have proof? The conservative party chairman argued that "to smear the prime minister as a right wing extremist is outrageous and irresponsible". The muslim community were highly dissapointed reminding everyone "again it just seems the Muslim community is very much in the spotlight, being treated as part of the problem as opposed to part of the solution." Yet Cameron did not stereotype which worked greatly in his favour as he acknowledged "We need to be clear: Islamist extremism and Islam are not the same thing." However he was belittled by Ajmal Masroor from the Islamic society of Britain who says "I think he's confusing a couple of issues: national identity and multiculturalism along with extremism are not connected." Some may argue Cameron gave a excellent, note free speech worthy of a Prime Minister, but he dodged the topic of immigration with care and reinforced how optimism is short lived in London.
So is Cameron being given a pat on the shoulder for contradicting himself whilst he funds faith schools? Is he focusing on less important issues when he should be tackling immigration and schools?
Do you agree with Cameron or disagree?
Tell It Like It Is